Sunday, February 2, 2014

Recommender Systems - Stalking or Advancing?


 
How many of you, while browsing on a website, have looked at a particular item and been given suggestions by the site telling you, "You Might Also Like...?" or "People Who Like This Also Like This?" I'm sure most all of us have been there. Perhaps we have made comments about how "creepy" or "weird" it is that advertisers and websites tend to know us on a more individual basis; and while it does appear to be a bit strange that our individual interests are being recorded, recommender systems are being used in many application settings to suggest products, services, and information items to potential consumers (Huang, 2007), thus becoming the ultimate successor in terms of satisfying the user's interests as well as gaining profit. Companies such as Amazon and Netflix have successfully deployed commercial recommender systems and reported increased Web and catalog sales and improved customer loyalty (Huang, 2007). In Chris Anderson's article, "The Long Tail," for example, it is described how Amazon recommendations brought about the popularity of a not-so popular novel. "The online bookseller's software noted patterns in buying behavior and suggested that readers who liked Into Thin Air [a successful novel by Jon Krakauer] would also like Touching the Void, a similar, but not-so successful novel written a decade prior to Krakauer's]” (Anderson, 2004). Recording the patterns of users on Amazon allowed the site to hone in on the individual interests of the users who liked one novel, and suggested to them the other novel – thus giving the less popular novel a great deal of recognition and gaining profit from the buyer who purchased the recommendation. Recommender systems are an "example of an entirely new economic model for the media and entertainment industries" (Anderson, 2004), and at the heart of this new economic model are the algorithms for making recommendations based on various types of input data. Most recommendation algorithms take as input the following three types of data: product attributes, consumer attributes, and previous interactions between consumers and products (e.g., buying, rating, and catalog browsing) (Huang, 2007). 
 
Netflix is an example of an application that utilizes recommender system algorithm aimed towards rating and catalog browsing as Netflix aims to satisfy the individual user, and not necessarily recommend a product that they hope to gain a financial profit from. To recommend movies and television shows to the Netflix user, Netflix merely bases the recommendations off of the ratings that the user provides to them with their five star rating scale. But as we all know, there is inevitably some grey area in a five-star rating system. Perhaps you watch a horrible Netflix movie, so you give it one star. Then after that movie, you watch another, which is ultimately a much better movie than the first, so you give it five stars. What would have happened if you watched the second movie first? Perhaps you would only have given it a three star rating. But can Netflix take these human factors into account? “It's easy to say you should take human factors into account — but how, exactly? How can you use psychology to study people about whom you know nothing except what movies they like” (Ellenberg, 2008)? In my opinion, merging psychology and technology is the next step in further developing recommender systems and advancing technology altogether.

Recommender systems, as described in Cosley’s, “Is Seeing Believing?” article states that they “are one tool that uses people’s opinions about items in an information domain in order to help people make decisions about which other items to consume.” Knowing what a user likes and dislikes, will inevitably result in satisfying the user as the information being presented to them is catered to their individual taste. Ellenberg states that “adding more dimensions” helps to find the “relationships between movies that no film critic could ever have thought of” (Ellenberg, 2008), and Advertising Age agrees: "When performed correctly, such personalization tactics drive higher engagement, increased conversions and greater brand loyalty" (Advertising Age, 2013), which is important in terms of keeping your user happy, but it also shows how individualized technology is becoming. These algorithms used to create the recommender systems are beginning to actually know the individual user beyond the mere demographic, which creates a much larger window of opportunity for people to spend less time figuring out what they want, because technology will ultimately provide them that service.
There has always been a strong emphasis on obtaining demographic information to analyze what media users consume. However, Ellenberg’s article, “This Psychologist Might Outsmart the Math Brains Competing for the Netflix Prize suggests that demographic information isn’t necessarily what is most important. Analyzing demographics merely groups individuals into categories, but now, it appears that companies and the Internet are becoming more interested in the individual user. With that being said, I am interested in what the future holds in terms of how users will be analyzed. Will the more generalized demographic research and analysis seize to exist because of the stronger emphasis on the individual user? How do you think future technology will be able to obtain more personal information about us?




Works Cited

Advertising Age. (2013, October, 08). How Recommendation Engines Work. Retrieved from
http://adage.com/article/glossary-data-defined/recommendation-engines-work/244583/

Anderson, C. (2004, October). The Long Tail. Retrieved from
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/tail.html?pg=1&topic=tail&topic_set=

Cosley, D., Lam, S., Albert, I., Konstan, J., Riedl, J. (2003) Is Seeing Believing? How Recommender Interfaces Affect Users’ Opinions. Retrieved from
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.2.6430&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Ellenberg, J. (2008, February, 25). This Psychologist Might Outsmart the Math Brains Competing for the Netflix Prize. Retrieved from
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/magazine/16-03/mf_netflix?currentPage=all

Huang, Z., Zeng, D., Chen, Hsinchun. (2007, September). A Comparative Study of Recommendation Algorithms in E- Commerce Applications. Retrieved from
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.79.8432&rep=rep1&type=pdf

3 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your blog post hit on some very true emotional feelings about content specific advertisements on the social media platforms we all use. It’s really quite creepy. I shop at some pretty obscure online retailers, and yet Facebook ads seemingly never miss a beat (or site) and almost always post an ad for the store the next time I log into Facebook; sometimes very obvious, sometimes not. What’s interesting is that it’s almost always on Facebook. It doesn’t happen on Tumblr, YouTube or even Google for me, and when in the few times it has in the past, it hasn’t been always accurate. It’s funny, however, because with YouTube, it’s not so much ads, but videos that YouTube thinks you will like based on your viewing patterns, which certainly isn’t as creepy as having those sandals you just looked at on Nordstrom’s website popping up on your Facebook dash (can you tell I’ve been there and done that?). And it makes sense, too: according to PEW Research Center, people who actually use social media typically use Facebook as their platform of choice, with Instagram as a close second. It’s really no wonder then that these recommender systems seem to be all over Facebook, where recent user engagement seems to have dropped, especially based on conversations with peers. On the other hand, I wonder if because Instagram has such a high engagement with its users, that perhaps that’s the reason it is ad free. Could you imagine an Instagram with ads based off the photo’s you like? I couldn’t and feel it drives people away, as obvious with Facebook.

    Now, I can certainly understand the perspective of the retailer who uses these recognition programs. How amazing is it that in 2014, retailers have the capability to determine exactly what a customer wants, and then display it to them. It just makes perfect sense, especially for companies whose online division is essential to the growth of their business. And retailers have gone a step further in their recommendation systems, as discussed in your blog post and Chris Anderson’s finding for Wired. Recommendation services are changing the way we live life: Yelp has become our new friend who fills us in on a happening restaurant and more retailers allows us to leave “feedback” about a product, either allowing us to purchase it, or see items similar to it that also come highly recommended. Using Nordstrom again as an example, have you ever noticed that when you click on a product with 4 or 5 star rating, all the other recommended products are the same color or style and have the same 4 or 5 star rating? I’ve certainly picked up on it, and like the author whose book revitalized an older, similar story, it’s a practical sales tactic. Eventually, I think a trend of complete personalization will emerge as a way to hone in on specific customer recommendations. I think the shift will definitely focus on the idea of the “individual user” that really started “way back when” with the “Personalized Computer.” People like choices and it really is all about options, regardless of how strange that Facebook ad for whatever obscure product you Google’d is. What I think needs to happen is a way to make this type of marketing a little more sophisticated and mature.

    -George Fracasse

    "Social Media Update 2013." Pew Research Center 30 Dec. 2013. Web.

    Anderson, Chris. "The Long Tail." Wired 12.10 (October 2004): 1 - 5. Web.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Picture this: You log into your Amazon account, and make a simple purchase like buying a textbook for your communications class. When you are done making your selection, and adding your item to the cart, Amazon alerts you about what other users like you, who purchased that particular book, are buying. Other times, they advertise other books that they think you would like, considering your choice. Advertisements are being pushed on us more and more these days, and they rule our world. Like you rightly said, it can be creepy and annoying. It’s amazing how far they would go to infiltrate your viewing experience (and internet privacy!), with ads. When I browse websites like Houzz.com and HGTV, I immediately begin to receive more product recommendations on MSN and other websites that I visit.
    My Netflix experience has been affected also, and I like that you reference that. The recommendation system does help me access movies and shows that I would have otherwise, not paid attention to, so in that regard it does work and begs the question: do consumers have a select preference of who they’d like to access their “personalized” browsing information? Shouldn’t it count for something that all advertisers want is to push for the possible sale of that book or movie that one hasn’t heard of? With Netflix as you pointed out, there isn’t necessarily a push for one to make a purchase, but I would look at the popularity Netflix gains as an added advantage. When you access a movie on Netflix and enjoy the convenience of not waiting for it to download, etc., it ultimately impacts your viewing experience and brings you back. (Or makes you recommend them to your friends and family, which translates to more revenue through subscriptions. Aha!)
    We will see more sophisticated recommendation systems as we continue to have more enhanced experiences on the Internet. As more people take to e-commerce to market their different forms of media products, there will continue to be the need to device more interesting ways of advertising to the consumer. The advancement of these systems is inevitable, but hopefully the consumer will be given the opportunity to opt out of these information-sharing systems, on the Internet.

    ReplyDelete